Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors With Fournier Gangrene: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Xinjuan Sun, Lei Wang, Gai Li, Haitao Zhang, Liyi Li, Guangyuan Xiang, Tianyuan Wang, Leilei Dong, Jin'an Chen, Aiping Wang

Published in

American journal of therapeutics. Volume 33. Issue 5. Pages e414-e417.

Abstract

This study investigated the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and Fournier gangrene (FG), analyzing additional risk factors using pharmacovigilance data.
Data were extracted from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Reporting (JADER) database (April 2014-August 2024), encompassing 914,713 adverse event reports, including 5770 involving SGLT2 inhibitors.
Among 40 identified FG cases (0.69% of SGLT2 reports), empagliflozin showed the strongest association (reporting odds ratio = 78.62) and canagliflozin the weakest. Male patients demonstrated significantly higher FG risk than female patients (P = 0.004), particularly with tofogliflozin. No significant correlation existed between obesity and FG occurrence. Onset timing varied widely (12-1515 days). Limitations include potential data incompleteness inherent to spontaneous reporting systems, limited sample size, and inability to establish definitive causality.
All 5 SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with FG, with empagliflozin carrying the highest risk. Male patients exhibited elevated susceptibility. Continuous monitoring throughout treatment is essential. Further clinical trials are warranted to clarify causal relationships.

PMID:
42714203
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement