Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The Reference Interval Values of Biochemical Parameters in Iranian Kurdish Adults: Results from Non-communicable Diseases of Ravansar Cohort.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Maryam Kohsari, Zohreh Rahimi, Farid Najafi, Mehdi Moradinazar

Published in

Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB. Volume 41. Issue 5. Pages 736-745. Epub Dec 02, 2024.

Abstract

This study aimed to establish age- and sex-specific biochemical parameters Reference intervals (RIs) in a healthy adult Kurdish population. The biochemical markers were investigated in 2850 individuals (1365 female and 1485 male) from Ravansar Non-Communicable Disease (RaNCD) cohort study. The biochemical markers were measured using an enzymatic assay. The non-parametric method was used to calculate RIs for all partitions. The liver enzymes and TG, HDL-C, and creatinine levels were gender- and age-dependent. The RIs of these parameters in the Iranian population are dramatically lower compared to other populations. Smokers and overweight subjects had higher liver enzymes and lipid profile levels. Similar results were obtained in post-menopause females. Individuals in the high physical activity group had a lower activity of ALP and GGT and a higher ALT and AST, also, lower lipid profile (TC, TG, and LDL) and FBS, and higher HDL levels. Our study suggests that chemical biomarkers are influenced by gender and age, and factors such as BMI, smoking status, physical activity, and menopause status must be considered in laboratory analysis. Additionally, the results indicated that reference values of commercial kits routinely used, especially liver enzymes, could not be appropriate for the Iranian Kurdish population.

PMID:
42712827
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement