Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

VAC-Stent as salvage therapy after failed surgical repair and self-expandable metal stent treatment in esophageal perforation.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Celia Martínez-Alvez, Arantxa Clavell, Marta Viciano, Daniel Humaran, Hugo Uchima, Elisenda Garsot

Published in

Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas. Sep 09, 2026. Epub Sep 09, 2026.

Abstract

Esophageal perforation is a life-threatening condition requiring prompt and individualized management. Although surgical repair remains an established treatment option, endoscopic therapies have increasingly gained a role in selected patients. We report the case of a patient who developed an esophageal perforation following Nissen fundoplication. Emergency surgical repair was initially performed, but persistent leakage was subsequently observed. A self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) was then placed; however, the fistula persisted despite this treatment. As both surgical and conventional endoscopic approaches had failed, endoscopic vacuum therapy combined with an esophageal stent (VAC-Stent) was used as salvage therapy. The VAC-Stent provided simultaneous drainage of the extraluminal cavity and coverage of the esophageal defect. Serial endoscopic assessment and device exchanges resulted in progressive cavity resolution and complete closure of the perforation. The patient resumed oral intake without recurrent leakage, dysphagia, or esophageal stenosis. More than one year after treatment, the patient remains asymptomatic with a good quality of life. This case highlights the potential role of VAC-Stent therapy as a minimally invasive salvage option for persistent esophageal perforation after failure of both surgical repair and SEMS treatment.

PMID:
42714109
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement