Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Two regions, two lineages: Untangling two centuries of confusion between Machilus glaucescens and M. macranthus (Lauraceae) through integrative taxonomy.

Created on 10 Sep 2026

Authors

Nabasmita Malakar, Ravikanth Gudasalamani, Ganesan Rengaian

Published in

PloS one. Volume 21. Issue 9. Pages e0357315. Epub Sep 09, 2026.

Abstract

The Asian genus Machilus (Lauraceae) of the Persea group is widely distributed across South and Southeast Asia. Like many other genera of Lauraceae, Machilus has received limited systematic attention, particularly in India. As a result, the nomenclature and systematic positions of Machilus glaucescens (Nees) Wight and M. macranthus Nees have remained unclear. In this study, we employed an integrative taxonomic approach to disentangle the taxonomy, phylogenetic relationships and distributions of M. glaucescens (restricted to Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot) and M. macranthus (restricted to Eastern Ghats and Western Ghats-Sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot). We analysed morphological, molecular, and distribution data to elucidate the systematic relationships following the mix-up of taxonomic status. We examined 28 morphological characteristics using cluster analysis and reconstructed phylogenies with two nuclear markers (ITS and LEAFY intron II). Additionally, we studied the distribution range of both species with ecological niche modelling. The combined evidence from nomenclature, morphological clustering, phylogenetic analyses, as well as the species distributional range limits confirms that M. glaucescens and M. macranthus are two distinct species with their current distributions restricted to separate biogeographic regions of Asia.

PMID:
42715235
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement