Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Annotation of Cell Types in Single-Cell Sequencing for Cardiovascular Disease: Concepts, Workflows, Challenges, and Best Practices.

Created on 10 Sep 2026

Authors

Lu Sun, Li Ma, Lizhi Chen, Wenqian Cai, Jianrui Wei, Kaihua Guo, Huaiyu Gu, Lingqi Zhou

Published in

The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology. Pages 107027. Sep 09, 2026. Epub Sep 09, 2026.

Abstract

Single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq) have transformed cardiovascular biology by resolving cellular heterogeneity and disease-specific cell states. The interpretive power of these technologies, however, hinges critically on accurate cell-type annotation, the assignment of biologically meaningful labels to clusters or individual cells. Mis-annotation risks systematic bias in mechanistic inference, obscures rare populations, and undermines cross-study reproducibility. This Review systematically integrates current conceptual frameworks, computational methodologies, and domain-specific best practices for cell-type annotation in cardiovascular single-cell research. We first examine the biological principles that underpin annotation, including the definition of cell types, the distinction between cell states and transitional phenotypes, considerations of granularity, and ontology mapping. We then delineate comprehensive analytical workflows spanning preprocessing and quality control (empty droplet filtering, doublet detection, normalization, and batch correction), dimensionality reduction (PCA, UMAP, t-SNE), and graph-based clustering. Turning to annotation strategies, we survey manual marker-based curation with canonical cardiovascular markers, reference-correlation methods (SingleR), supervised machine-learning classifiers (CellTypist, SingleCellNet, Garnett, scBERT), reference-mapping and label-transfer platforms (Azimuth, scArches, Symphony), and hybrid probabilistic frameworks (scANVI). We also summarize the software ecosystems of R/Seurat and Python/Scanpy/scvi-tools. Benchmarking evidence indicates that annotation accuracy depends more on reference data quality than on algorithmic sophistication. SingleR, CellTypist, and Azimuth have emerged as leading performers, whereas ensemble consensus approaches that integrate two or more independent methods enhance robustness. We further highlight cardiovascular-specific challenges, including modality-dependent differences in cardiomyocyte representation between scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq, vascular and stromal heterogeneity, immune cell tissue adaptation, disease-induced transitional cell states, and barriers to cross-species translation. Finally, we present a ten-step best-practice workflow, a comprehensive reporting and reproducibility checklist, and illustrative case studies drawn from the Adult Human Heart Atlas and CardioAtlas. We offer practical recommendations and discuss future directions encompassing multimodal integration, spatial transcriptomics, and AI-assisted annotation, all aimed at ensuring reproducible and interpretable annotations across laboratories [1-5].

PMID:
42716373
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement