The evolution of asymmetrical regulation of physiology is central to aging.

Authors

Mirre J P Simons, Marc Tatar

Published in

Ageing research reviews. Pages 103368. Sep 09, 2026. Epub Sep 09, 2026.

Abstract

The evolutionary biology of aging is fundamental to understanding the mechanisms of aging and how to develop anti-aging treatments. Thus far most evolutionary theory concerns the genetics of aging with limited physiological integration. Here we present an intuitive evolutionary framework built on how physiology is regulated and how this regulation itself ages. Life has evolved to secure reproduction and avoid system failure in early life, and it is the regulation that evolves in response to those early life selection pressures that we suggest leads to the emergence of aging. The costs of dysregulation of physiology are not symmetrical, for example, they are not the same for over- and under-activation. As a consequence, asymmetry in the regulation of physiology will evolve. When asymmetrical regulatory systems break during aging, they cause physiological function to drift toward the physiological range where costs of dysregulation are lowest, rendering aging directional. Our model explains many puzzling aspects of the biology of aging. These include why aging appears (but is not) programmed, why aging is gradual yet heterogeneous, why cellular and hormonal signaling are closely related to aging, the compensation law of mortality, why trade-offs between reproduction and aging remain elusive, why longer-lived organisms show more signs of aging during their natural lifespans, and why longer-lived organisms can be less responsive to anti-aging treatments. We provide predictions of our theory that are empirically testable. By incorporating physiological regulation into evolutionary models of aging, we provide a novel perspective to guide research in this growing field.

PMID:
42716445
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.