Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

What systems must protect: relational care, uncertainty and recovery in early psychosis care.

Created on 10 Sep 2026

Authors

Karen O' Connor, J V E Smith

Published in

BMJ mental health. Volume 29. Issue 1. Sep 09, 2026. Epub Sep 09, 2026.

Abstract

Early psychosis services, including early intervention in psychosis programmes (EIP), are built on principles of timely access, continuity and recovery-oriented, evidence-based care. While these elements are well described at a model level, less attention has been paid to the relational work required to deliver them effectively. In this perspective paper, we argue that EIP care is fundamentally relational, characterised by sustained engagement, tolerance of uncertainty and the nurturing of hope. We describe key features of this work. These include entering the person's world, holding multiple perspectives and navigating differing explanatory models of illness, as well as the role of stigma in shaping help-seeking and engagement. We also explore the emotional and organisational tensions inherent in relationally flexible care. These include risks relating to burnout, boundaries and resource allocation. Finally, we argue that protecting relational capacity within teams through adequate resourcing, supervision and manageable caseloads may itself represent a fidelity issue for EIP systems. As EIP services expand, maintaining 'relational fidelity' while allowing flexibility in delivery poses a critical challenge for systems and leaders. Relational fidelity refers to preserving the conditions that allow sustained, trusting engagement and continuity over time.

PMID:
42716695
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement