Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Anxiety disorders in China and G20 countries: A comparative burden study.

Created on 10 Sep 2026

Authors

Yuling Wang, Wenjun Wang, Xiao Liu, Mengqi Zhou, Rubing Gu, Fengjuan Lv

Published in

The Journal of international medical research. Volume 54. Issue 9. Pages 3000605261485098. Epub Sep 10, 2026.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the burden and temporal patterns of anxiety disorders in China with those in Group of Twenty (G20) countries from 1990 to 2021 and to project future disease burden.MethodsThis ecological secondary analysis used publicly available, aggregated estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 for China and G20 countries. We assessed incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years using decomposition analysis, autoregressive integrated moving average models, and Bayesian age-period-cohort models.ResultsChina's age-standardized anxiety disorder burden decreased after 2000 (average annual percentage change, -1.2%). Its age profile differed from those of G20 countries, with a relatively greater disease burden among middle-aged and older adults. The prevalence of anxiety was 1.8-fold higher in females than in males. Decomposition analysis attributed 68% of the increase in anxiety prevalence in China to epidemiological change and population growth, whereas population aging accounted for 52% of the increase in G20 countries with a high sociodemographic index. The total number of anxiety cases in China were projected to rise by 22% by 2040, despite stable age-standardized rates.ConclusionsAnxiety disorder burden patterns differed between China and G20 countries and were associated with demographic and developmental contexts. These ecological findings support development-sensitive mental health planning and warrant confirmation in studies using individual-level data.

PMID:
42720557
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement