Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Quantitative Thresholds on 18F-DCFPyL PET for Determining Malignancy in Prostate Cancer with Pathologic Correlation.

Created on 11 Sep 2026

Authors

Liza Lindenberg, Erich Huang, Gary A Ulaner, Krishnan R Patel, Ida Sonni, Katelyn Niknam, G Reza Berenji, Stephen Peacock, Kalpna Prasad, Ethan Bergvall, Mona Cedo, Joseph Carreon, Brynn Leonard, Maximillian Lindenberg, Ravi Madan, Melissa Abel, Deborah Citrin, Peter Pinto, Baris Turkbey, Frank Lin, Peter Choyke, Esther Mena

Published in

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. Sep 10, 2026. Epub Sep 10, 2026.

Abstract

In this article, we assess histologically validated quantitative parameters on 18F-piflufolastat (18F-DCFPyL) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET and identify thresholds for differentiating malignant prostate cancer from benign tissue. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, men with prostate cancer who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT followed by surgery or biopsy at 4 institutions were included. Histopathology reports and CT-guided biopsy images were anatomically matched to PET/CT, and corresponding regions of interest were delineated. Univariable associations between lesion malignancy and PET parameters (SUVmax/mean, total lesion uptake (TLU), tumor volume (TV), ratios to blood, liver, and spleen) were tested using likelihood ratio tests. Multivariable models incorporating PET and clinical variables were also evaluated. Analyses were performed for all lesions combined and separately for prostate and metastatic lesions. Results: In total, 305 men with 476 PET regions of interest matched to histologic specimens were analyzed. Across all lesions, malignancy was associated with all PSMA PET parameters (P = 0.011 for TV; P < 0.001 for all other metrics). Similar associations were observed in metastatic lesions (P = 0.001 for TV; P < 0.001 for all other metrics). In prostate lesions, malignancy was associated with all PET parameters except TV (P = 0.970 for TV; P < 0.001 for all other metrics). Among all evaluated metrics, SUVmax to blood-pool ratio showed the highest discriminatory performance across all lesions, prostate lesions, and metastatic lesions, with thresholds ranging from 2.86 to 2.97, sensitivities from 0.841 to 0.950, and specificities from 0.788 to 0.911. Ratios of TLU to blood-pool, liver, and spleen also performed well. SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLU yielded good sensitivity across cohorts, although specificity was lower in some subgroups. For prostate lesions, the SUVmax threshold of 5.43 yielded a sensitivity of 0.843 and a specificity of 0.927. Multivariable models combining PET parameters, particularly blood-pool and liver-referenced metrics, with clinical variables further improved discrimination between malignant and benign lesions. Conclusion: SUVmax-to-blood and TLU-to-blood cutoffs can distinguish malignant prostate cancer from benign tissue and may support clinical decision-making, including biopsy selection. Larger studies are required for further confirmation.

PMID:
42722438
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement