Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Blood Pressure Mediates the Association Between Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity and Basal Ganglia Enlarged Perivascular Spaces: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Created on 11 Sep 2026

Authors

Shang Li, Yuan Liu, Peipei Yang, Shuohua Chen, Ying Hui, Xinyu Zhao, Xian-Quan Shi

Published in

Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). Volume 28. Issue 9. Pages e70363.

Abstract

Although carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) is the non-invasive gold standard for assessing aortic stiffness, evidence linking cf-PWV to basal ganglia enlarged perivascular spaces (BG-EPVS) in the general population is limited. We aimed to evaluate this association and quantify the mediating role of blood pressure (BP) in community-based adults. This cross-sectional study included 485 participants from the Kailuan cohort. Cf-PWV was measured by ultrasound, and BG-EPVS were graded on 3.0-Tesla MRI. Logistic regression, restricted cubic spline, and mediation analyses were applied to quantify the indirect effects of systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP). BG-EPVS were identified in 59.4% of participants. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors other than BP, cf-PWV ≥ 10 m/s was independently associated with BG-EPVS (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.27-3.36), with a linear dose-response relationship (p for non-linearity = 0.668). The association was stronger among participants aged ≤ 70 years and among males. SBP and PP mediated 43.0% and 43.6% of the total cf-PWV effect, respectively, whereas DBP did not function as a significant mediator. Higher cf-PWV was independently and dose-dependently associated with BG-EPVS, with pulsatile BP components mediating approximately 43% of this association.

PMID:
42723378
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement