Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Using the social ecological model to understand the factors that influence the attitudes women have towards the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV in Uganda.

Created on 11 Sep 2026

Authors

Grace Mary Kenyonga, Rebecca Hodes

Published in

AIDS care. Pages 1-21. Sep 11, 2026. Epub Sep 11, 2026.

Abstract

The use of biomedical means of HIV prevention, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), is effective in reducing HIV infection in high-risk groups that include women. Regardless of the known efficacy of PrEP, the number of women using PrEP in Uganda is still low. People's decisions to engage in a health behaviour, in this case, PrEP, is influenced by the attitudes and perceptions they have towards it. This study explored the factors that influence women's attitudes and decisions to use PrEP. Qualitative methods were used to collect data from women aged 18-45 years, health workers, and female community leaders in Kampala and Wakiso districts. The social ecological model was utilised to examine the factors influencing attitudes towards PrEP. Knowing PrEP availability, efficacy, access points, support of people in their circles, personal risk assessment of HIV infection, cultural and societal norms, and accessibility of PrEP-providing facilities were noted as factors that influence attitudes towards PrEP. Improving PrEP initiation among women calls for increased public sensitisation on PrEP, aimes at reducing stigma. Interventions targeting married women should involve their partners. Increasing the number of PrEP providing sites. Multi-level interventions should be formulated to address constraints at the different levels of society.

PMID:
42723443
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement