Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Integrative SMR prioritizes oxidative stress-related regulatory genes for Alzheimer's disease with brain-tissue validation.

Created on 12 Sep 2026

Authors

Liu Wu, Yu-Ting Dong, Xin Mu, Xiao Luo, Ze-Jun Chen

Published in

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease. Volume 13. Issue 5. Pages 100535. Epub Mar 17, 2026.

Abstract

Oxidative stress (OS) plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet its genetic and epigenetic regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we applied a three-step summary-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) framework to integrate Alzheimer's disease (AD) GWAS summary statistics with peripheral-blood eQTL and mQTL datasets, and further evaluated brain-tissue relevance using GTEx v8 and AMP-AD resources. Across the three-step SMR analyses, we prioritized multiple OS-related candidate genes (e.g., CRLS1, PRKAA1, CYP2E1, GPX1, and APP) associated with AD risk, and brain-tissue analyses further highlighted KEAP1, SIRT1, and PRDX5 as region-relevant signals. Functional enrichment analyses highlighted critical pathways such as "Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response" and "PI3K-AKT signaling," emphasizing the roles of oxidative stress, mitochondrial function, and neuroinflammation in AD. Novel regulatory mechanisms were uncovered at methylation sites (e.g., cg20211653 associated with ABCA1), linking epigenetic regulation to transcriptional mechanisms and providing candidates for brain-tissue follow-up. This study provides new insights into the molecular underpinnings of AD, bridging genetic variation, epigenetic regulation, and transcription, and identifies potential therapeutic targets for mitigating oxidative damage and neurodegeneration.

PMID:
41844011
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement