Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

STI1 domains coordinate partitioning of UBQLN2 into stress-induced condensates.

Created on 12 Sep 2026

Authors

William Haws, Thuy P Dao, Bridget Varner, Holly B Jones, Mallory P Brown, Carlos A Castañeda

Published in

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. Apr 15, 2026. Epub Apr 15, 2026.

Abstract

UBQLN2 is a ubiquitin-binding shuttle protein that undergoes phase separation in vitro and localizes to stress-induced cellular condensates including stress granules. The central region of UBQLN2 contains two chaperone- and substrate-binding STI1 domains (STI1-I, STI1-II) and disordered linkers; the individual contributions of these domains and linkers to cellular condensate partitioning remain poorly characterized. Here we use live-cell imaging and immunofluorescence experiments to systematically examine domain requirements for UBQLN2 puncta formation in cultured human cells. We show that in vitro phase separation propensity largely correlates with puncta formation in transfected cells. Importantly, STI1-II and UBA domains are each required for baseline puncta formation in cells, but not STI1-I. In contrast, both STI1 domains are required for heat stress-induced puncta formation. Removal of STI1-II abrogates this stress response, and STI1-I deletion substantially attenuates it. Using N-terminal truncation constructs, we demonstrate that STI1-I strongly promotes both phase separation and puncta formation in the absence of the N-terminal region containing the UBL domain. Together, our findings demonstrate that the two STI1 domains of UBQLN2 have distinct roles in puncta formation and condensate partitioning, with STI1-II essential under all conditions.

PMID:
41959388
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement