Perceptions and use of publicly funded episodic virtual care: Cross-sectional survey data from New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

Authors

Emran Hasan, François Gallant, Rebecca H Correia, Stephanie Welton, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Tara Kiran, Lindsay Hedden, Julie Easley, Nichole Austin, Shelley Doucet, A Luke MacNeill, Alison Luke, Rachel Thelen, Colin Newman, M Ruth Lavergne

Published in

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien. Volume 72. Issue 9. Pages 555-566.

Abstract

To explore public perceptions of episodic virtual care (EVC) and to identify patient characteristics associated with use of EVC services.
Cross-sectional study.
New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
Individuals 18 years or older residing in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
EVC perception was assessed by asking whether virtual visits with someone other than a personal family physician or nurse practitioner can meet the day-to-day health needs of patients (emergencies excepted). Usage was determined by asking whether EVC services were used in the past 12 months. Multivariable ordered and binary logistic regression models explored associations between patient characteristics, EVC perception, and EVC use. Agreement with a range of statements reflecting perception of EVC services was described.
Of the 3882 respondents, 56.3% agreed or strongly agreed that EVC could meet their day-to-day health needs, and 46.7% of a representative population panel (n=895) reported using EVC services in the past 12 months. EVC meeting the day-to-day needs of patients was associated with better comfort with technology (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26 to 2.93), trust in the health care system (AOR=4.15, 95% CI 2.40 to 7.18), basic or routine medical needs (AOR=1.82, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.79), and no disability (AOR=1.45, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.11). EVC use was strongly associated with not having a regular family physician or nurse practitioner (AOR=3.41, 95% CI 1.56 to 7.46), and was negatively associated with being an older adult (45 to 54 years: AOR=0.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.85; 55 to 64 years: AOR=0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.77) and a rural resident (AOR=0.29, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59). More than 80% of respondents reported that EVC is suitable or completely suitable for minor short-term health concerns (eg, common cold), prescription renewals, and referrals, whereas less than 50% found it suitable or completely suitable for ongoing health conditions.
Findings reflect perceptions that EVC can play a role in meeting primary care needs, particularly among those with less complex medical needs, but current use is most strongly associated with not having a regular primary care clinician.

PMID:
42728048
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.