Caudal versus penile block and urethrocutaneous fistula formation following hypospadias repair in children <2 years: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors

Andreas Taenzer, Tessa N Mandler, Alexia Gagliardi, Megan A Brockel, Vijaya Vemulakonda, Sophie R Pestieau, David M Polaner, PRAN Investigators

Published in

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Sep 11, 2026. Epub Sep 11, 2026.

Abstract

Retrospective studies report conflicting associations between caudal block and urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) formation after hypospadias repair, often without control for hypospadias severity. Our multicenter randomized, non-inferiority trial compared UCF incidence following caudal versus penile block for single-stage hypospadias surgery.
Children ≤2 years undergoing primary single-stage midshaft or distal hypospadias repair at 16 Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network centers were randomized to caudal (group C) or penile block (group P) with general anesthesia. The primary outcome was UCF formation within 3 postoperative months. Secondary outcomes included perioperative opioid administration, and postoperative pain scores (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC)).
Of 210 subjects, 161 (76.6%) completed 3-month follow-up (group C: N=79; group P: N=82). UCF occurred in 7/79 (8.9%) group C and 6/82 (7.3%) group P patients (RR=0.98; 95% CI (0.35 to 2.76); p=0.9). Proximal meatal position was associated with increased UCF risk (RR=2.8; 95% CI (1.48 to 5.30); p=0.002). Group C received less intraoperative (33% vs 56%, p<0.001) and rescue opioids (4.9% vs 15.7%; p=0.01) and had lower mean postanesthesia care unit (PACU) FLACC scores (0.49±1.34 vs 1.14±2.3; p=0.03).
In this early terminated randomized trial, no statistically significant difference in UCF formation was observed between caudal and penile blocks. Caudal block was associated with reduced perioperative opioids and lower pain scores. However, incomplete enrollment, loss to follow-up and wide CIs limit precision, and clinically important differences between the techniques cannot be excluded. The findings should be considered exploratory and may inform future trials and evidence generation.
NCT02861950.

PMID:
42727983
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.