Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Preferences for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to help detect skin cancer in primary care settings: a UK-wide discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Created on 12 Sep 2026

Authors

Owain T Jones, Fiona M Walter, Rubeta N Matin, Natalia Calanzani, Jon Emery, M van der Schaar, Stephen Morris

Published in

British journal of cancer. Sep 11, 2026. Epub Sep 11, 2026.

Abstract

AI technologies could help triage suspicious skin lesions. The aim of this study was to examine preferences of general practitioners (GPs), patients, and members of the public for different attributes of AI technologies to help detect skin cancer.
A DCE using online surveys, with choice scenarios based on: false negative and positive rates, cost, location of AI technology, efficacy on different skin tones, and guideline recommendations. Data were analysed using alternative-specific conditional logit regression models.
2302 participants completed the survey. All attributes significantly influenced the respondents' preferences. Ranking of attributes by relative importance was the same for GPs, patients, and members of the public: false negative rate was the most important attribute, followed by skin tones on which the technology had been developed and tested. False negative results had a significantly greater negative effect on GP choices than for other groups. Participants preferred AI technologies used by healthcare professionals in a GP surgery over AI technologies patients use at home.
Implementation of AI technologies to detect skin cancer should focus on minimising false negative rates. Development and testing of AI technologies using data across all skin tones is essential. Preferences for AI technologies could have significant implications for successful implementation.

PMID:
42728369
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement