Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Fourier-based chemometric resolution of the FOLFOX regimen through digital filtering with poly-metric sustainability assessment.

Created on 12 Sep 2026

Authors

Hadir M Maher, Salma Mahmoud Mohamed, Ekram M Hassan, Amira Fawzy El-Yazbi

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 16. Issue 1. Sep 11, 2026. Epub Sep 11, 2026.

Abstract

The FOLFOX regimen, comprising oxaliplatin (OXA), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LU), is a standard first-line protocol for colorectal cancer therapy. Given its clinical centrality, developing rapid and high-throughput analytical tools for simultaneous determination of its components is essential. However, severe spectral overlap among the three drugs severely complicates their direct spectrophotometric analysis. In this study, novel spectrophotometric methods were developed and validated for the concurrent quantification of OXA, 5-FU, and LU without preliminary separation steps. While direct and first-derivative spectrophotometric analysis successfully resolved binary fractions, complete resolution of the ternary mixture was uniquely achieved through a hybrid double divisor ratio spectra (HDDR) approach integrating trigonometric Fourier functions. The methods were validated in accordance with ICH Q2(R1) guidelines, exhibiting high linearity (r > 0.999), excellent recoveries (98.0-102.0%), and high precision (RSD < 2.0%) across therapeutic concentration ranges. Furthermore, multi-metric evaluation tools demonstrated improved scores relative to reported chromatographic methods, including higher AES, AGREE, MoGAPI, AGSA, CaFRI, RGB, BAGI, and VIGI scores. The developed HDDR method offers an eco-friendly, rapid, and cost-effective alternative for routine quality control of the FOLFOX regimen.

PMID:
42728343
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement