Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2011 update).

Authors

EFSA on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)

Published in

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority. Volume 9. Issue 12. Pages 2497. Epub Dec 09, 2011.

Abstract

EFSA is requested to assess the safety of a broad range of biological agents (including microorganisms and viruses) in the context of notifications for market authorisation as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) assessment was developed by EFSA for its own use to provide a generic risk assessment approach applicable across EFSA's scientific Panels, for biological agents notified for intentional use in the whole food chain. The safety of unambiguously defined biological agents at the highest taxonomic unit that is appropriate for the purpose for which an application is intended and the completeness of the body of knowledge are assessed. Identified safety concerns for a taxonomic unit are where sensible reflected as 'qualifications' when a recommendation for the QPS list is given. The list of QPS recommended biological agents is reviewed and updated annually. Therefore, the only valid list is the one in the most recent scientific opinion. The 2011 update reviews microorganisms previously assessed including bacteria, yeasts, filamentous fungi and viruses used for plant protection purposes and confirms the previous recommendations. The anamorph yeast form Phaffia rhodozyma of Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous was included on the QPS list and to the qualification for yeasts 'absence of resistance to antimycotics used for medical treatment of yeast infections', the sentence was added that 'in the case of Saccharomyces cerevisiae this qualification applies for yeast strains able to grow above 37 °C'. The body of knowledge of filamentous fungi and enterococci was updated and their ineligibility for the QPS list confirmed.

PMID:
42016000
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.