Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Effect of Counterforce Brace Placement on Muscle Activation in Healthy Adults.

Created on 13 Sep 2026

Authors

Mohsen Radpasand, Hamed Radpasand

Published in

Journal of chiropractic medicine. Volume 24. Issue 1-4. Pages 300-307. Epub Oct 31, 2025.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the optimal placement of a counterforce brace in muscle activation and strength in healthy participants.
Seven healthy participants (14 hands) with no history of lateral humeral epicondylitis were randomly assigned to two groups from an initial pool of 12 participants. Group A (4 participants, 8 hands) wore a hard knob-padded counterforce brace near the lateral epicondyle, while Group B (Control Group) (3 participants, 6 hands) wore the brace in its customary location, aligned with the lateral epicondyle over the proximal third of the forearm near the muscle belly. Brace placement was assigned to the dominant hand for each participant, while the nondominant hand received the alternative brace placement (ie, the other position of the counterforce brace). Acceleration amplitude and integrals were dependent variables. The design allowed for comparison of outcomes from 2 different brace placements within the same individual.
The hard knob-padded counterforce brace positioned near the lateral epicondyle demonstrated better outcomes compared to the customary placement.
This study offers insights into the influence of counterforce brace placement on muscle activation and strength in healthy participants. In this study, placement of the brace at the lateral epicondyle showed better muscle strength and reduced acceleration amplitude, compared to traditional placement.

PMID:
42152916
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement