Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The Clinical Significance of SPOP Upregulation and Nuclear Accumulation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Created on 13 Sep 2026

Authors

Yin-Hwa Shih, Nan-Chin Lin, Yen-Wen Shen, Ming-Gene Tu, Tong-Hong Wang, Yu-Hsin Tseng, Shih-Min Hsia, Tzong-Ming Shieh

Published in

International journal of molecular sciences. Volume 27. Issue 5. Feb 28, 2026. Epub Feb 28, 2026.

Abstract

The speckle-type BTB/POZ protein (SPOP) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor typically considered a tumor suppressor, yet its role in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear. This study investigated SPOP expression, arecoline regulation, and its potential as a HNSCC biomarker. SPOP mRNA and its protein were quantified in HNSCC (FaDu, GMN, HSC-3, SAS, and A253) and normal oral epithelial (SG) cell lines via RT-qPCR and Western blot; arecoline's effect on SG, SAS, and A253 cells was evaluated. SPOP mRNA was analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) HNSCC cohort, and protein localization was assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays. SPOP mRNA was higher in some HNSCC lines; arecoline induced SPOP in SG cells, but not in HNSCC cell lines. TCGA confirmed SPOP mRNA upregulation in tumors correlating with grade. IHC showed SPOP upregulation in HNSCC, particularly in palate and pharynx/hypopharynx sites. The nuclear SPOP-positive ratio shifted from 12.14 ± 9.82% in normal tissues to 61.26 ± 33.03% in tumors (p < 0.0001), differentiating grades and sites better than total expression. SPOP is upregulated in HNSCC and inducible by arecoline. Enhanced nuclear SPOP localization indicates malignancy and progression, identifying it as a potential HNSCC diagnostic and progression biomarker.

PMID:
41828504
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement