Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Experimental Sleep Restriction Blunts Positive Emotions and Aesthetic Experiences When Viewing Artwork.

Created on 13 Sep 2026

Authors

Ariadne D Godinho, Chenlu Gao, Michelle R Hebl, Michael K Scullin

Published in

Journal of sleep research. Pages e70451. Sep 11, 2026. Epub Sep 11, 2026.

Abstract

Sleep loss influences basic emotional and cognitive processes, but its impact on higher-order naturalistic cognition, such as aesthetic judgements, is less understood. The current study primarily investigated whether experimental sleep restriction altered aesthetic evaluations of abstract artwork, and secondarily tested whether these evaluations were influenced by stereotypes associated with the listed artist's gender or ethnicity (Caucasian vs. African American). Sixty-eight young adults (Mage = 19.97, 52.94% female, 55.88% non-Caucasian) completed a multi-week, counterbalanced, crossover study under laboratory control. Following an adaptation night, participants completed both a mild sleep restriction condition (1:30 AM-7:00 AM) and a well-rested condition (10:00 PM-07:00 AM). In the morning following the second night of each sleep condition, participants rated 12 abstract paintings, each of which was paired with a fictitious artist's name that was stereotypical of a specific gender (male/female) and ethnicity (Caucasian/African American). No effects or interactions were observed for artist names. Importantly, however, mild sleep restriction decreased ratings of painting likability and beauty. These effects were mediated by sleepiness/alertness and positive mood state. The findings suggest that mild sleep restriction compromises the aesthetic experience of viewing artwork.

PMID:
42728768
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement