Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Advancing the helox compensation method to estimate intercellular humidity in leaves of diverse species.

Created on 13 Sep 2026

Authors

Amber R Jolly, Thomas N Buckley

Published in

The New phytologist. Sep 13, 2026. Epub Sep 13, 2026.

Abstract

The relative humidity in the intercellular airspaces of leaves (h) has long been thought to be saturating, but several recent studies have questioned this assumption. We present and develop a method to estimate h, describe practical considerations for its application, and demonstrate it on eight species (Gossypium hirsutum, Helianthus annuus, Heteromeles arbutifolia, Laurus nobilis, Liriodendron tulipifera, Magnolia grandiflora, Oryza sativa, and Pyrrosia hastata). N2/O2 (nitox) is replaced with He/O2 (helox), which speeds stomatal diffusion, but ambient humidity is simultaneously increased to keep transpiration rate unchanged. This allows the expressions for transpiration in nitox and helox to be set equal to one another, leading to a solution for h. We were able to rapidly switch to helox and simultaneously change humidity such that transpiration rate remained unchanged to within ±2.5% (< 0.54% in most cases). We found h ranging between 71 and 94% of saturation. Whereas other methods to estimate h either require special analytical tools (isotopic gas analysis, spectroscopically resolved fluorescence measurements with proprietary fluorophores) or special conditions (amphistomatous broad leaves with zero CO2 exchange at one leaf surface), our method requires only water vapor concentration measurements and can be performed on any leaf under nearly any conditions.

PMID:
42732459
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 29
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement