The Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm in Clinical Vestibular Testing: An Interpretation-Focused Narrative Review.

Authors

Leonardo Manzari

Published in

The journal of international advanced otology. Volume 22. Issue 4. Pages 1-10. Aug 26, 2026. Epub Aug 26, 2026.

Abstract

Suppression head impulse test (SHIMP) is a video head impulse test paradigm in which the visual target is head-fixed. Because the head impulse stimulus is identical to the conventional head impulse paradigm (HIMP; earth-fixed target), the 2 paradigms provide complementary information: HIMP primarily reveals vestibular hypofunction through compensatory catch-up saccades, whereas SHIMP elicits post-impulse anti-compensatory "recapture" saccades in healthy individuals and can therefore highlight residual vestibular drive and the integrity of the vestibulo-saccadic interaction. Since its first clinical description, SHIMP has been applied across unilateral and bilateral vestibular disorders and, more recently, in selected central nervous system conditions. However, interpretation remains variable between laboratories and devices and can be confounded by predictable stimulation, early saccades, covert substitution strategies, and phase-dependent changes after acute vestibular loss. This narrative review focuses on an interpretation framework that explicitly separates (i) vestibular drive (slow-phase vestibulo-ocular reflex and gain) from (ii) the saccadic strategy required to re-foveate the task-defined target. The review synthesizes the physiological rationale for the reversed saccadic signature of SHIMP versus HIMP, proposes a terminology set, and provides practical interpretation rules with key sub-cases (acute versus follow-up unilateral vestibular loss; bilateral vestibulopathy with "inappropriate" covert saccades; SHIMP-negative patterns with functional gain in central disorders). Emphasis is placed on trace-level waveform inspection and longitudinal, context-aware reading of gain and saccade metrics.

PMID:
42732638
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.