Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

First United States Experience With Focal Pulsed-Field Ablation Using the FARAPOINT Catheter for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia.

Created on 14 Sep 2026

Authors

Jorge L Reyes, Rezwan Munshi, Collin Goebel, Venkat Tholakanahalli

Published in

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. Sep 13, 2026. Epub Sep 13, 2026.

Abstract

Drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) after failed radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a clinical challenge. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is expanding to ventricular applications, but United States experience with focal pulsed-field-only catheters in VT is sparse, and pulsed-field platforms are not equivalent across manufacturers. Here we describe the first United States experience of FARAPOINT focal PFA in patients with refractory VT.
We retrospectively reviewed ten consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation with the FARAPOINT (Boston Scientific) focal PFA catheter at a single VA Health Care System between July 2025 and May 2026. All patients had drug-refractory sustained monomorphic VT. Median age was 77 years with a mix of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Six of ten had at least one prior failed catheter ablation. Acute non-inducibility was achieved in all nine patients who underwent formal post-ablation stimulation testing. No procedural complications occurred. Over a median follow-up of 95.5 days, sustained VT recurred in four of ten patients. No patient underwent repeat ablation, required mechanical circulatory support, or died.
In this initial United States experience, FARAPOINT was safe and acutely effective in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy within a high-risk cohort with refractory VT and prior failed ablations, including challenging substrates. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to expand these observations.

PMID:
42732570
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 23
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement