Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Variations in the clinical characteristics of geographic atrophy among Caucasians, Japanese Americans in Hawaii, and Japanese in Japan.

Created on 14 Sep 2026

Authors

Satoko Fujimoto, Gregg T Kokame, Ryo Kawasaki, Chikako Hara, Jase N Omizo, Kohji Nishida

Published in

Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). Pages 100372. Sep 13, 2026. Epub Sep 13, 2026.

Abstract

To compare clinical characteristics of geographic atrophy (GA) among Caucasians in Hawaii (C-A), Japanese Americans in Hawaii (J-A), and Japanese in Japan (J-J).
Retrospective study.
Consecutive patients with GA were recruited from single institutions in Hawaii and Japan, and GA areas within 6×6mm² OCT scan area were measured on near-infrared images obtained at the latest visit. Ethnic differences in GA-related characteristics were assessed using mixed-effects models adjusted for age and sex. All values are means.
A total of 125 eyes from 91 patients were included: 51 eyes of 36 C-A (58% men), 36 eyes of 26 J-A (35% men), and 38 eyes of 29 J-J (69% men). Bilateral GA was more frequent in C-A (72%) than in J-J (34%, P < 0.01), while J-A (50%) did not differ from either group. The number of GA foci was greater in C-A (2.8) than in J-A (1.9, P < 0.05) and J-J (1.5, P < 0.01). GA area was significantly larger in C-A (10.3mm²) than in J-J (8.8mm², P < 0.05), with J-A (6.0mm²) intermediate. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was thinner in C-A (83.3µm) than in J-A (140.8µm, P < 0.001) and J-J (165.3µm, P < 0.0001).
The number of GA foci and SFCT differed between J-J and C-A as well as between J-A and C-A, suggesting genetic differences. In contrast, significant differences in GA area and bilaterality were observed only between J-J and C-A. The intermediate values in J-A may reflect environmental influences. Further studies are warranted.

PMID:
42732817
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement