Short-Term Changes in the Occlusal Contacts During Anterior Segmental Orthodontic Treatment With Clear Aligners in Adult Patients.

Authors

Ji-Hye Song, Ji-Hyun Lee, Sanghee Lee, Kee-Joon Lee, Jung-Yul Cha, Chooryung J Chung, Kyung-Ho Kim

Published in

Orthodontics & craniofacial research. Sep 13, 2026. Epub Sep 13, 2026.

Abstract

To compare ClinCheck-predicted and achieved maxillary occlusal contact areas immediately after an initial 14-aligner anterior segmental sequence without programmed posterior movement.
This retrospective study included 31 adult women treated with 14 maxillary and mandibular clear aligners. Bilateral first premolars through second molars were digitally locked. Predicted stage-14 models and intraoral scans obtained immediately after aligner 14 and before refinement were assessed at maximum intercuspation. Contact regions at 0.00-mm clearance were quantified with ImageJ. The primary outcome was the patient-level total posterior achieved-minus-predicted difference. Tooth-type differences were analysed using patient-clustered generalized estimating equations with Holm adjustment; bite-ramp comparisons were exploratory.
Predicted and achieved total posterior areas were 63.71 ± 36.56 and 30.30 ± 18.26 mm², respectively (mean difference, -33.41 mm²; 95% CI, -44.42 to -22.40; p < 0.001). After Holm adjustment, the achieved central-incisor area was 0.49 mm² greater than predicted (p = 0.003), whereas areas were smaller at the first premolars, second premolars, first molars, and second molars by 3.09, 5.44, 11.46, and 13.42 mm², respectively (adjusted p ≤ 0.016). Lateral-incisor and canine differences were not significant. Bite-ramp groups did not differ significantly.
After 14 aligners, the achieved posterior contact area was substantially smaller than predicted despite no programmed posterior movement. This early discrepancy supports direct evaluation of posterior contacts before refinement.

PMID:
42732960
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.