Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Optimizing daily spontaneous breathing trial timing to expedite extubation.

Created on 14 Sep 2026

Authors

Nathan Nesbitt, Jamie Zimmer, Ryan Bellomy, Emily Amin

Published in

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. Volume 80. Pages 102950. Sep 13, 2026. Epub Sep 13, 2026.

Abstract

Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are a crucial tool used to assess patients who are being mechanically ventilated for extubation readiness.
As a quality improvement initiative, we have conducted a pre-post implementation study to evaluate whether changing the daytime scheduling of an SBT results in a reduction in SBT completion to extubation timing.
We conducted a retrospective chart review of randomly selected general medical intensive care unit patients before and after an SBT timing change from 0500-0600 to 0800-0900 over a 13-month period. We reviewed 220 subjects in the pre-intervention group and 226 in the post-intervention group, and data analysis was performed using scipy.stats in Python.
There was a significant reduction in the time from SBT to extubation in the 0800-0900 group compared to the 0500-0600 group (1.13 [0.48, 2.67] vs 3.63 [1.32, 6.32] h, p = <0.001).
Therefore, we concluded that among this sample of intubated MICU subjects, changing SBT timing from 0500-0600 to 0800-0900 resulted in a significant decrease in SBT to extubation time. Reducing the SBT to extubation time minimizes the need to re-sedate a patient to promote continued ventilator tolerance. Thus, our results show that evaluating daily SBT timing can be a valuable quality improvement intervention that impacts patient centered outcomes.

PMID:
42732705
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement