Beyond data gaps: how prior knowledge in the Gulf of California drives spatial biases in whale survey efforts.

Authors

Omar García-Castañeda, Jorge M Lobo, Jorge Urbán R, Lili Pelayo-González, Alejandro Gómez-Gallardo U

Published in

PeerJ. Volume 14. Pages e21685. Epub Sep 10, 2026.

Abstract

We analysed whale survey effort conducted by multiple research groups to evaluate whether sampling-limited or knowledge-limited inventory processes better explain observed gaps in whale records. Using data from the Gulf of California, survey effort was quantified as the number of navigation routes and travelled kilometres crossing grid cells at five spatial resolutions. Its spatial distribution was examined in relation to environmental and geographic variables using Generalised Linear Models. Results indicate that survey effort was highly concentrated across all spatial resolutions, with fewer than 10% of grid cells accounting for the highest levels of sampling. Environmental predictors explained only a limited proportion of this spatial variation. However, shallow bathymetry, colder waters, and higher productivity were consistently associated with greater survey effort. Analyses of residuals and spatial autocorrelation revealed systematic underestimation of effort in a small number of heavily surveyed areas, indicating sampling intensities far exceeding those expected based solely on environmental conditions. These over-surveyed areas coincided with independently identified hotspots of whale occurrence, suggesting that survey effort has been preferentially directed towards locations already known to support high whale densities. Biases affecting biodiversity databases are commonly interpreted as resulting from insufficient sampling; however, they may also reflect the influence of prior knowledge guiding where data are collected. Our results therefore support a knowledge-limited inventory scenario, in which accumulated experience and expectations shape survey design and reinforce existing spatial biases.

PMID:
42733816
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.