Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Predicting epistasis across proteins by structural logic.

Created on 15 Sep 2026

Authors

Michelle Tang, Gareth A Cromie, Anowarul Kabir, Martin S Timour, Julee Ashmead, Russell S Lo, Nathaniel Corley, Frank DiMaio, Hiroki Morizono, Ljubica Caldovic, Nicholas Ah Mew, Andrea Gropman, Amarda Shehu, Aimée M Dudley

Published in

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Volume 123. Issue 3. Pages e2516291123. Jan 20, 2026. Epub Jan 16, 2026.

Abstract

Accurately predicting the phenotypic consequences of genetic variation is a major challenge for precision medicine. The problem is exacerbated by epistatic interactions, nonadditive effects between genetic variants that produce unexpected phenotypes. Here, we explore an understudied form of positive epistasis: intragenic complementation, in which pairs of loss-of-function variants restore near wild-type protein function. Using mutational scanning in yeast, we identify thousands of such interactions in a clinically important enzyme, human argininosuccinate lyase (ASL). Restoration of protein function is not due to the biochemical properties of the substituted amino acids, but rather to a structural feature of the protein, the active site assembly. We develop a machine learning algorithm that uses protein language model embeddings to predict intragenic complementation in ASL with 99.6% accuracy. Additionally, the model trained on ASL generalizes to a structurally related but sequence-divergent enzyme, fumarase, with accuracy over 90%. Our findings reveal a structural basis for this form of epistasis and provide a predictive framework that could extend to at least 4% of human proteins.

PMID:
41543897
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement