Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Impact of Donor Volatile Anesthetic Choice on Recipient Post-Reperfusion Syndrome and Clinical Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Created on 15 Sep 2026

Authors

Hyeun-Joon Bae, Shiyeun Lee, Kyoung-Sun Kim, Hye-Mee Kwon, In-Gu Jun, Jun-Gol Song, Gyu-Sam Hwang

Published in

International journal of molecular sciences. Volume 27. Issue 8. Apr 13, 2026. Epub Apr 13, 2026.

Abstract

Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) remains a critical complication in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). While sevoflurane is recognized for its organ-protective properties, the impact of the donor's anesthetic choice on recipient outcomes has not been clearly established. This study evaluated whether donor sevoflurane anesthesia reduces the incidence of PRS in recipients compared to desflurane. We retrospectively analyzed 5006 adult LDLT recipients whose donors received either sevoflurane or desflurane. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize selection bias, resulting in 941 matched pairs. The incidence of PRS was significantly lower in the sevoflurane group (64.0%) compared to the desflurane group (71.8%; p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression identified donor sevoflurane as an independent protective factor against PRS (odds ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.41-0.55; p < 0.001). Furthermore, recipients in the sevoflurane group exhibited significantly lower rates of prolonged intensive care unit stay, along with superior recovery of liver enzymes and inflammatory markers. Our findings suggest a potential association between donor sevoflurane anesthesia and more favorable early recipient outcomes, including a reduced incidence of PRS and enhanced recovery.

PMID:
42074109
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement