Occlusion-Aware Visibility Coverage for Robotic Stop-and-Scan 3D LiDAR Mapping.

Authors

Sangmin Kim, Yonghyeon Song, Byeongjun Kim, Tae-Yong Kuc

Published in

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 26. Issue 17. Aug 27, 2026. Epub Aug 27, 2026.

Abstract

Automated three-dimensional (3D) mapping with a survey-grade terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) is the canonical instance of robotic stop-and-scan light detection and ranging (LiDAR) mapping: the mobile platform must remain stationary for minutes per scan, so the environment must be covered with as few scans as possible. Where to stop hinges on a coverage model predicting what a scan pose will observe. The conventional isotropic-disk model counts every free cell within sensing range as covered-including cells behind walls-and, therefore, skips scans that genuine observation requires. We replace the disk with a ray-cast visibility region computed on the robot's live two-dimensional (2D) occupancy map, admitting only cells in direct line of sight; define a line-of-sight (LOS) coverage metric over mapped free space and drive a marginal-gain scan/skip rule embedded in frontier exploration. The planner thus performs 2D scan-station placement for subsequent 3D mapping. In a controlled paired ablation in simulation, the visibility rule raises LOS coverage from about 77% to 84-85% for one to two additional scans, and it also outperforms a disk baseline governed by the identical marginal-gain rule, isolating the coverage model itself as the decisive factor. In a fully autonomous on-hardware comparison in an industrial test room, with each rule driving a mobile platform carrying a Leica BLK360 G1, the visibility rule raised LOS coverage from 77.6% to 92.1%; every visibility run's scans registered offline at survey grade (4-5 mm bundle error, 84-88% overlap), whereas disk runs yielded at best a single-link network and once a single unregistrable scan. The results indicate that, for the room-scale indoor environments studied, occlusion-aware visibility is a sounder basis than Euclidean proximity for stop-and-scan placement.

PMID:
42740049
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.