Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Defining lung function in asthma remission: Results of an international Delphi study.

Created on 15 Sep 2026

Authors

Angelica Tiotiu, Jonathan A Bernstein, David Price, Juan Carlos Ivancevich, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Fulvio Braido, Pierachille Santus, Silviya Novakova, Plamena Novakova, Stefan Frent, Francisco-Javier Gonzalez-Barcala, Andras Bikov, Herberto Jose Chong-Neto, Krzysztof Kowal, Giuseppe Liistro

Published in

Pulmonology. Volume 32. Issue 1. Pages 2732616. Epub Sep 15, 2026.

Abstract

A consensual criterion regarding lung function (LF) assessment that could be included in the definition of asthma remission on treatment (tAR) is currently lacking.
This work aimed to identify a criterion concerning LF evaluation corresponding to this concept.
A survey was conducted using the Delphi method. The scientific board established 16 candidate statements to be included in the questionnaire. A 5-point Likert scale was used to measure agreement for each statement. The predefined conditions for statement selection were a median score ≥ 4 and >60% of responses indicating agreement. The survey included four rounds: three including the board members and one - 177 participants through the Interasma Scientific Network platform.
Following the first two rounds, six statements reaching consensus were included in the large survey. They incorporated various definitions used for 'normal' and 'stable' LF together with elimination of airway hyperresponsiveness and variability during bronchodilator testing. Three statements gained consensus during the third round. The final selected criterion associates 'stable LF' over time with a 'negative reversibility test' or 'negative challenge test'.
This Delphi process identified a criterion based on LF assessment that may serve as support for future consensual definition of tAR after prospective validation.

PMID:
42740613
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 24
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement