Understanding never events: developing an ecologically valid behavioral test for left-right confusion during surgery.

Authors

Moritz Thaler, Henning Parschau, Janne Carstensen, Lorenz Mühlig, Jonathan Kirner, Hümeyra Altunkaynak, Gabriel Kändler, Rainer Petzina, Sebastian Ocklenburg

Published in

Frontiers in cognition. Volume 5. Pages 1802120. Epub Aug 31, 2026.

Abstract

The accurate distinction between left and right is a critical cognitive function. A failure to correctly distinguish left and right during surgery can lead to a so-called Never Event, a preventable medical error that leads to death or severe injury of the patient. Unfortunately, such wrong-site surgeries still happen every year. Thus, understanding left-right confusion during surgery is critical for patient safety. However, current Left-Right Confusion (LRC) tests have low ecological validity for the complex, time-critical demands of a surgical environment. This study introduces the Never Events in Surgery Test (NEST), a novel, ecologically valid behavioural paradigm designed to simulate the cognitive dynamics during surgery.
Participants (N = 108) completed the NEST alongside established LRC tasks: the Bergen Left-Right Discrimination Task (BLRDT), the Left-Right Commands Task (LRCT), and the Left-Right Questionnaire (LRQ).
NEST performance was significantly modulated by the posture of the training doll. Error rates were lowest in the prone position compared to lateral orientations (p < 0.05), while the supine position resulted in the shortest reaction times, significantly outperforming both prone and lateral positions (p < 0.001) without a significant increase in error rates. Crucially, the study established a cognitive dissociation: while reaction times across tasks were correlated, reflecting a shared component of general processing speed, the error rates from the established LRC measures (BLRDT, LRCT, LRQ) failed to predict the error rate observed in the applied NEST paradigm.
The lack of predictive power for errors suggests that LRC susceptibility in applied contexts is an independent, context-specific risk factor for laterality errors not captured by traditional assessments. The findings argue for a paradigm shift in training and screening toward tailored, context-specific approaches.

PMID:
42740931
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.