Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Socioeconomic correlates of social asymmetry in English older adults: Findings from a population-based cohort study.

Created on 15 Sep 2026

Authors

Bill Calvey, James Laurence, Joanna McHugh Power

Published in

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences. Sep 15, 2026. Epub Sep 15, 2026.

Abstract

Discrepancies between loneliness and social isolation (i.e., social asymmetry) are linked to physical and psychological health in later life. While psychological correlates of social asymmetry are increasingly documented, socioeconomic correlates remain underexplored. The study examined whether individual- and area-level socioeconomic indicators were longitudinally associated with social asymmetry in English older adults.
Data were drawn from 8,164 older adults aged 60+ participating in Waves 7-9 (2014-2019) of the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing. Social asymmetry was operationalised as a continuous discrepancy score between standardised loneliness (UCLA-3 Loneliness) and social isolation (modified Berkman-Syme Social Network Index), with positive values indicating social resilience (i.e., lower loneliness relative to isolation) and negative values indicating social vulnerability (i.e., higher loneliness relative to isolation). Time-varying generalised estimating equations assessed longitudinal associations between social asymmetry and multiple socioeconomic indicators.
All socioeconomic indicators were independently associated with social asymmetry, even after adjusting for psychological covariates. Third level education (β=.44, p<.001), higher household income (β=.22, p<.001) and subjective social status (β=.004, p<.001) were associated with social resilience. Conversely, individual-level deprivation (β=-.04, p<.001), area-level deprivation (β=-.20, p<.001), population density (β=-.18,p<.001), rare/no internet use (β=-.26, p<.001), unemployment (β=-.07, p<.05) and renting in either private (β=-.35, p<.001) or social housing (β=-.41, p<.001) were associated with social vulnerability.
Social asymmetry is associated with both psychological factors and structural socioeconomic inequalities. Addressing loneliness in later life, when social networks can shrink, may therefore require interventions that extend beyond individual behavioural changes to target broader community-level socioeconomic inequalities.

PMID:
42742397
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement