Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Risk Assessment in Flow-Diverter Implantation of Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia: A Novel Three-Subtype Classification.

Created on 16 Sep 2026

Authors

Haochen Huang, Zhe Ji, Simin Wang, Jingwei Li, Tongyu Zhang, Ao Qin, Chuan He, Hongqi Zhang

Published in

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. Sep 15, 2026. Epub Sep 15, 2026.

Abstract

Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia is a rare cerebrovascular disorder with a poor natural history. Flow diverters have emerged as a treatment option, but clinical outcomes remain heterogeneous and predictors of procedural risk are lacking. This study aimed to identify predictors of perioperative outcomes and develop an imaging-based classification for risk stratification.
We retrospectively analyzed 59 consecutive patients with unruptured vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia who underwent flow-diverter implantation between 2018 and 2023. Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed at 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the mRS, and angiographic outcomes by occlusion status. Logistic regression identified predictors of perioperative unfavorable outcomes. Lesions were characterized by the location of maximal dilation relative to the AICA origin and the presence of intraluminal thrombus.
Complete 1-year clinical follow-up was available for all 59 patients. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 34 patients (57.6%) at a median of 9 months. Perioperative unfavorable outcomes occurred in 16.9%, and complete occlusion was achieved in 44.1%. Intraluminal thrombus (P = .04) and AICA-distal location (P = .05) were independent predictors of unfavorable perioperative outcome. Lesions were classified into three subtypes: Type A (AICA-distal with thrombus), Type B (AICA-distal without thrombus), and Type C (AICA-proximal). Perioperative unfavorable outcomes were most frequent in Type A (50%) compared with Type B (12.5%, P = .04) and Type C (6.5%, P = .004). Procedure-related complications occurred in 50%, 62.5%, and 22.6% of Type A, B, and C lesions, respectively, with a significantly lower rate in Type C than in Type B (P = .007). At 1-year, unfavorable outcomes remained more common in Type A lesions than in Type C lesions (58.3% vs 16.1%, P = .02). Angiographic occlusion rates did not differ among subtypes.
We propose a three-subtype classification for vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia based on intraluminal thrombus and lesion location relative to the AICA that may help stratify procedural risk with flow-diverter implantation. Type C lesions may represent relatively more suitable candidates for treatment, whereas Types A and B may carry higher risk and should prompt cautious patient selection. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted.

PMID:
42744586
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 29
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement