Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Vitamin D3 oral rinsing reduces salivary SARS-CoV-2 antigen detectability: a clinical trial with public health implications.

Created on 16 Sep 2026

Authors

Sarah M Nizar Feteih, Emily L G Heaphy, Amjad Aljagthmi, Abdullah Abumdaini, Daniyah Bayumi, Ghadeer Albishi, Ashraf Dada

Published in

Frontiers in oral health. Volume 7. Pages 1943222. Epub Sep 01, 2026.

Abstract

To determine whether a Vitamin D3 oral rinse alters the performance of saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing (RAT) and assess its potential implications for infectious disease screening and public health surveillance.
In this prospective, paired-sample, single-blind clinical trial, 25 adults with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection provided saliva immediately before and after a standardized one-minute Vitamin D₃ oral rinse (50 paired specimens). Samples were analyzed in parallel by saliva RAT and rapid RT-PCR under blinded conditions.
The oral rinse converted 68% (17/25) of paired specimens from RAT-positive to RAT-negative, reducing antigen positivity from 54.2% to 32.0% (p = 0.0016). In contrast, RT-PCR positivity remained largely preserved (96.0% vs. 88.0%), with no significant change in mean Ct values (28.1 ± 5.9 vs. 29.4 ± 5.1; p = 0.1785). Strong concordance between paired RT-PCR samples (ρ = 0.814, p < 0.0001) indicated persistent viral RNA despite reduced antigen detection.
Vitamin D₃ oral rinsing was associated with reduced detection by saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 RAT while RT-PCR results remained largely preserved. These findings suggest a previously under-recognized pre-analytical variable capable of altering saliva-based antigen detection.Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07068282, Identifier, NCT07068282.

PMID:
42745778
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement