Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Interpretable Scalar-on-Image Linear Regression Models via the Generalized Dantzig Selector.

Created on 16 Sep 2026

Authors

Sijia Liao, Xiaoxiao Sun, Ning Hao, Hao Helen Zhang

Published in

Journal of the American Statistical Association. Jul 27, 2026. Epub Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

The scalar-on-image regression model examines the association between a scalar response and a bivariate function (e.g., images) through the estimation of a bivariate coefficient function. Existing approaches often impose smoothness constraints to control the bias-variance trade-off, and thus prevent overfitting. However, such assumptions can hinder interpretability, especially when only certain regions of an image influence changes in the response. In such a scenario, interpretability can be better captured by imposing sparsity assumptions on the coefficient function. To address this challenge, we propose the Generalized Dantzig Selector, a novel method that jointly enforces sparsity and smoothness on the coefficient function. The proposed approach enhances interpretability by accurately identifying regions with no contribution to the changes of response, while preserving stability in estimation. Extensive simulation studies and real data applications demonstrate that the new method is highly interpretable and achieves notable improvements over existing approaches. Moreover, we rigorously establish non-asymptotic bounds for the estimation error, providing strong theoretical guarantees for the proposed framework. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

PMID:
42746531
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement