Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Targeted community screening in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation enhances the detection of liver fibrosis.

Created on 17 Sep 2026

Authors

Huw F Purssell, Stephanie R Landi, Alexander A Warner-Levy, Lucy R Bennett, Jennifer A Scott, Christopher E Mysko, Deepankar Gahloth, Oliver E Street, Indra Neil Guha, Neil A Hanley, Karen Piper Hanley, Varinder S Athwal

Published in

Hepatology communications. Volume 10. Issue 10. Oct 01, 2026. Epub Sep 16, 2026.

Abstract

Risk-factor-based community screening has been used to identify early liver disease. Risk-factor prevalence and liver-related outcomes are significantly affected by socioeconomic deprivation. However, the impact on targeted community screening is unknown. We evaluated the influence of deprivation on fibrosis detection within a population screening pathway.
A total of 1613 patients were assessed using 2 pathways: Proactive case finding at 7 primary care practices (PCPs) and a comparator standard-of-care pathway. Individuals with specific risk factors were identified: obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2), type 2 diabetes, alcohol consumption >400/>280 g/week in males/females, respectively, coding for steatosis and ALT >50/>35 IU/mL in males/females, respectively. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥8.0 kPa was used to determine fibrosis, and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) was used to determine deprivation at the individual and neighborhood level.
In all, 325 (20.1%) patients had LSM ≥8.0 kPa. Fibrosis detection increased with the number of risk factors [2: OR 2.47 (p=0.027, 95% CI 1.11-5.50), 3: OR 5.19 (p <0.001, 95% CI 2.34-11.53), 4: OR 10.19 (p <0.001, 95% CI 4.44-23.40), 5: OR 23.40 (p <0.001, 95% CI 6.15-89.04)]. Patients with a low IMD score (<10) had significantly lower median LSMs than those with a high IMD score (>50) [5.4 kPa vs. 6.0 kPa (p=0.0005)]. In the proactive case finding pathway, obesity prevalence was higher in PCPs in areas of high deprivation [83.5% vs. 65.6% (p=0.003)]. Fibrosis detection was significantly higher in PCPs situated in neighborhoods with high socioeconomic deprivation compared with low deprivation [27.0% vs. 8.6% (p=0.028)].
Liver fibrosis detection was disproportionately higher in neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic deprivation. Screening strategies targeting areas with higher deprivation could increase the diagnostic yield of advanced fibrosis.

PMID:
42748410
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement