Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cascade Skip-Connection BiLSTM Autoencoder for CPR Artifact Removal Prior to AED Shock Advisory.

Created on 17 Sep 2026

Authors

Jaechan Lim, David Hicks, Matt Valentine, Ki H Chon

Published in

IEEE open journal of the Computer Society. May 25, 2026. Epub May 25, 2026.

Abstract

Current automated external defibrillators require pauses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for reliable ECG rhythm analysis, reducing chest compression fraction and delaying defibrillation.
We propose a skip-connection BiLSTM autoencoder (SBAE) that removes CPR artifacts directly from one-dimensional ECG signals without auxiliary reference signals or time-frequency transformation. A cascade architecture employs a balanced model for initial denoising followed by biased models whose reconstruction is optimized toward one rhythm class. A conservative routing strategy labels cases where the two stages disagree as indeterminate. Performance was evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation with artifact-level data separation using an FDA-approved shock advisory algorithm.
The cascade SBAE achieved 97.51 ± 1.91% sensitivity for ventricular fibrillation, 94.58 ± 3.39% for ventricular tachycardia, 99.30 ± 0.28% specificity for normal sinus rhythm, 98.02 ± 3.02% for asystole, and 97.21 ± 1.05% for other non-shockable rhythms, exceeding American Heart Association thresholds for all categories. The indeterminate rate was 3.63 ± 1.10%.
The proposed framework provides a compact, reference-free solution for shock advisory decision support in automated external defibrillators. Deployment on embedded AED hardware would require additional model optimization and platform-specific engineering.

PMID:
42327859
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement