Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Factors influencing clinician escalation practices for deteriorating patients in an Australian emergency department.

Created on 17 Sep 2026

Authors

Na Wang, Ruth Endacott, Simon Cooper, Clifford J Connell

Published in

Australasian emergency care. Sep 16, 2026. Epub Sep 16, 2026.

Abstract

Physiological deterioration is typically identified through clinical signs and symptoms. There is a growing adoption of emergency department-specific responses to patient deterioration. Although the effectiveness of ward-based Rapid Response Systems is well-documented in the 'failure-to-rescue' literature and widely used in acute medical and surgical wards, their implementation and factors influencing failure-to-rescue in emergency department settings are less well understood.
To explore emergency nurses' and doctors' perceptions and experiences of escalation practices for deteriorating patients, including the factors influencing these practices, in an Australian ED.
A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews and Framework Analysis. Interviews were conducted with emergency nurses and doctors who had recently cared for deteriorating emergency department patients.
Thirty-one emergency nurses (n = 22) and doctors (n = 9) participated in the interviews. Five themes were identified that influenced escalation: i) understanding deterioration and the escalation process, ii) influence of patient factors, iii) influence of environmental factors, iv) influence of staff factors, and v) organisational influences.
Clinicians' recognition of patient deterioration and decisions to escalate care transcend formal policy and are influenced by clinical expertise and judgement, interpersonal interactions, environmental pressures and organisational context.

PMID:
42749557
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 22
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement