Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Predicting non-specific binding of VHHs using machine learning models with cluster-aware validation.

Created on 17 Sep 2026

Authors

Valentin Stanev, Federico Devalle, Mehdi Boroumand, Maryam Pouryahya, Isabelle Sermadiras, Jenna Caldwell, Kuan-Lin Chen, Jay Hyun Jo, Rohan Jain, Bismark Amofah, Tony Pham, Mark Hutchinson, Sharfa Farzandh, Jen DiChiara, Chacko Chakiath, Tom Diethe, Andrew Dippel, Gilad Kaplan, Rebecca Croasdale-Wood

Published in

mAbs. Volume 18. Issue 1. Pages 2732787. Epub Sep 16, 2026.

Abstract

Propensity for nonspecific binding-also known as polyreactivity-is a serious developability risk factor for biotherapeutic candidates. To minimize this risk, drug companies are increasingly relying on in silico tools utilizing machine learning methods, but developing these tools is challenging. For example, the available data often contains many closely related sequences originating from drug pipeline projects, which can introduce significant biases in the in silico models training and benchmarking, leading to poor generalizability on new data. We present here a workflow designed to diagnose and mitigate some of the problems associated with using pipeline data. The workflow is based on a custom cross-validation procedure that can evaluate model performance on unseen data in different contexts. As a demonstration of the workflow, we use it to train a model to predict variable heavy-chain only fragment antibodies (VHH) binding to baculovirus particles (BVP)-a widely used assay for nonspecific binding. Using descriptors based on computed protein structures, the workflow identifies several risk factors that correlate with higher polyreactivity levels.

PMID:
42749679
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement