Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Correlation of bevacizumab relative dose intensity with first-line treatment outcomes in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Created on 17 Sep 2026

Authors

Liming Zhang, Meilin Chen, Zhen Yang, Meiling Gong, Ruilian Yu

Published in

Journal of gynecologic oncology. Sep 11, 2026. Epub Sep 11, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate the association between bevacizumab relative dose intensity (RDI) and first-line treatment outcomes in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
We retrospectively analyzed 72 patients treated with first-line bevacizumab plus paclitaxel-platinum chemotherapy between January 2019 and September 2024. Patients were categorized using X-tile-derived RDI cutoffs as low (≤0.61), intermediate (>0.61 to <0.93), or high (≥0.93). Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events were compared, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess factors associated with PFS.
ORRs were 40.0%, 75.0%, and 80.0% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-RDI groups, respectively (p=0.011). Median PFS was 12.6, 21.2, and 23.5 months, respectively (log-rank p=0.037), with the greatest difference between the low- and high-RDI groups (p=0.018). In multivariable analysis, high versus low RDI was associated with a lower risk of progression (hazard ratio=0.463; 95% confidence interval=0.235-0.913; p=0.026). Overall adverse-event incidence did not differ significantly among groups; however, grade 3-4 neutropenia and thromboembolic events were significantly more frequent in the high- than low-RDI group.
Lower bevacizumab RDI was associated with poorer response and shorter PFS. Given the retrospective single-center design, the optimal RDI threshold requires validation in larger prospective studies.

PMID:
42750305
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement