A Critical History of Co-Production in the Design and Delivery of UK Mental Health Services.

Authors

Pete Fleischmann, Peter Schofield

Published in

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy. Volume 29. Issue 5. Pages e70865.

Abstract

The term co-production is now very common and risks losing its original egalitarian and emancipatory meaning. Questions about what the term means relate to how the concept developed historically. We conduct a critical history of the concept to shed some light on this and inform contemporary practice.
To chart the history of co-production focusing on co-production in the design and delivery of mental health services; critically examining the extent to which the original egalitarian promise has been realised.
We draw on early foundational texts, key UK policy frameworks and legislation, mental health service user/survivor movement accounts and more recent guidelines, using illustrative cases to critically examine the concept.
Early accounts from the US stressing reciprocity, shared power, and active citizenship directly influenced approaches to UK mental health services. Further accounts from the user/survivor movement stressed the importance of power sharing and a critique of medical models of mental distress. UK policy frameworks and legislation have since brought co-production from the margins to the mainstream, introducing a tension between a mainstream concept of co-production influencing services through collaboration and a service user/survivor concept of co-production as equal power sharing.
Historically there have been a range of conceptions of co-production with different notions of what power sharing means for service users working alongside professionals.
Both authors have past lived experience of using psychiatric services. The manuscript was also shared with a small group of user/survivors with a particular interest in co-production and their feedback incorporated in the final draft.

PMID:
42750479
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.