Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multicentre insights into OPAT: a comprehensive analysis of Türkiye's unstructured system.

Created on 18 Sep 2026

Authors

Elif Agüloğlu Bali, Belgin Coskun, Halime Araz, Yakup Gezer, Arzu Tarakçı, Feyza Nur Akçin Balan, Lütfiye Nilsun Altunal, Barış Manavlı, Petek Konya, Cihan Semet, Sevda Özdemir Al, Elif Yılmaz İlmin, Çiğdem Mermutluoğlu, Ayşe Şenbaba Kara, Melike Nur Özçelik, Neşe Saltoğlu, Gözde Dalgan, Uğur Önal, Ahmet Doğan, Meryem Sena Toker, Mehmet Çelik, Duygu Çerçioğlu Özdemir, Sibel Karabulut, Süleyman Koç, Yasemin Çakır Kıymaz, Özge Eren Korkmaz, Hacer Demirköse, Büşra Tanır, Eda Alp

Published in

BMC infectious diseases. Volume 26. Issue 1. Aug 25, 2026. Epub Aug 25, 2026.

Abstract

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a well-established, cost-effective treatment modality delivered through structured, multidisciplinary programs worldwide. In Türkiye, no standardized OPAT framework exists; patients continue therapy through emergency departments, primary care facilities, or privately funded nursing services. This is the first multicentre study to evaluate clinical outcomes, treatment adherence, and patient satisfaction with OPAT in Türkiye.
This prospective multicentre study enrolled adult patients receiving OPAT for chronic osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, prosthetic joint infection, or urinary tract infection across 20 hospitals in Türkiye between March and August 2024.
A total of 265 patients were included (53.2% male; mean age 61.4 ± 13.5 years). Gram-positive pathogens predominated (60.2%); the most frequently used antibiotics were teicoplanin (70.5%), ceftriaxone (16.6%), and aminoglycosides (6.8%). The clinical success rate was 94.3%. ADEs led to treatment discontinuation in only 3 patients (1.1%). OPAT initiated at university hospitals was significantly more likely to be continued via emergency departments than at state hospitals (p = 0.010). Treatment-related adverse events occurred significantly more frequently outside dedicated OPAT units (18% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.030). Patient satisfaction was high overall; however, urinary tract infection patients reported significantly greater satisfaction than those with bone and joint infections across multiple domains. Additionally, patients treated in dedicated OPAT units reported significantly higher satisfaction than those treated in emergency departments across all domains assessed.
The absence of a structured OPAT system in Türkiye increases emergency department burden and elevates complication risk. Despite this, high clinical success rates and patient satisfaction support OPAT's potential as a viable alternative to inpatient care. A standardized, multidisciplinary OPAT framework is needed to improve patient safety and optimize healthcare resource utilization.

PMID:
42754855
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement