Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks from wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM2.5 in 20 US states.

Created on 18 Sep 2026

Authors

Min Zhang, Edgar Castro, Minghao Qiu, Mahdieh Danesh Yazdi, Boyuan Li, Rosalind J Wright, Joel D Schwartz, Robert O Wright, Yaguang Wei

Published in

Nature communications. Volume 17. Issue 1. Sep 17, 2026. Epub Sep 17, 2026.

Abstract

Increasing wildfire activity in the US has made wildfire-specific fine particulate matter (PM2.5) an important and growing source of air pollution, yet its long-term health impacts and relative toxicity compared with non-wildfire PM2.5 remain unclear. Using a self-controlled design, we examine associations between 2-year average wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM2.5 and cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks across 20 US states during 2006-2019. Per 1 µg/m3 increase, wildfire-specific PM2.5 is associated with significantly higher hospitalization risks for all cardiopulmonary diseases, with relative risks ranging from 10% for heart failure to 16% for asthma. In contrast, a 1-µg/m3 increase in non-wildfire PM2.5 is associated with smaller risk elevations, ranging from 4.7% for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to 8.5% for hypertension. Stronger associations for both wildfire-specific and non-wildfire PM2.5 are observed among minorities, metropolitan residents, those with fewer years of education, and more deprived communities. Overall, at an equivalent concentration increase, long-term exposure to wildfire-specific PM2.5 poses greater cardiopulmonary hospitalization risks than non-wildfire PM2.5, underscoring wildfire smoke as a growing public health threat that requires targeted mitigation alongside conventional air quality control strategies.

PMID:
42754610
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 16
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement