Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Corrigendum] TIP60 governs the auto‑ubiquitination of UHRF1 through USP7 dissociation from the UHRF1/USP7 complex.

Created on 18 Sep 2026

Authors

Tanveer Ahmad, Waseem Ashraf, Abdulkhaleg Ibrahim, Liliyana Zaayter, Christian D Muller, Ali Hamiche, Yves Mély, Christian Bronner, Marc Mousli

Published in

International journal of oncology. Volume 69. Issue 5. Epub Sep 18, 2026.

Abstract

Following the publication of the above article, and an Expression of Concern statement (doi: 10.3892/ijo.2026.5908) that was published in light of the fact that the GAPDH control western blots shown in Fig. 5A on p. 9 were strikingly similar to the GAPDH control western blots shown in Fig. 5D, the authors have responded to the queries raised by the Editorial Office. The GAPDH panels shown in Figs. 5A and 5D were generated from the same experiment and the same set of protein lysates: Fig. 5A presented the analysis of total protein expression, whereas Fig. 5D presented immunoprecipitation analyses performed using material derived from these same experimental samples. Consequently, the GAPDH loading control was legitimately shared between the two figures. However, given that the original figure legend did not explicitly state that the same GAPDH loading control was used for both analyses, to eliminate any possible ambiguity for readers, the authors have revised Fig. 5 by replacing the representative '-MG132 panel' in Fig. 5A with results obtained from an independent repeat experiment performed under identical experimental conditions. The revised version of Fig. 5 is shown on the next page. Note that this revised figure reproduces the original findings, and does not affect the quantitative analyses, the interpretation of the data, or the conclusions of the study. Regarding a query raised by the Editorial Office concerning the presentation of flow cytometric plots in Fig. 8, the authors explained that Fig. 8E was generated by applying an additional fluorescence gate to the parent flow cytometry dataset shown in Fig. 8B, which represents standard flow cytometric analysis, rather than duplication of experimental data, and so this figure was presented correctly, and as intended by the authors. The authors thank the Editor of International Journal of Oncology for granting them the opportunity to publish this corrigendum, and all the authors agree with its publication. [International Journal of Oncology 59: 89, 2021; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5269].

PMID:
42757459
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement