Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Pediatric Repeat Lung Transplantation: A Contemporary Analysis of Trends and Outcomes.

Created on 18 Sep 2026

Authors

Wonshill Koh, JangDong Seo, Todd Jenkins, Don Hayes

Published in

Pediatric transplantation. Volume 30. Issue 9. Pages e70460.

Abstract

Repeat lung transplant (re-LTx) is the only life-saving treatment option for those with irreversible allograft failure. Using a multi-institutional registry database, we investigated the prevalence and outcomes of pediatric re-LTx over the past 35 years.
A retrospective analysis was performed using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). First-time and repeat pediatric LTx candidates from 1989 to 2024 were identified. Univariate analyses, multivariable Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier plots were performed for a comprehensive analysis.
We identified 1396 primary LTx and 81 re-LTx recipients. The transplant-free survival rates for the primary and re-LTx groups were 80% versus 65% at 1-year (p = 0.004). Re-LTx was a risk factor for worse 1-year post-LTx outcomes (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.19, 2.8; p = 0.006). The days between primary and re-LTx (< 1 year vs. > 1 year) did not have a statistically significant impact on 1-year post-re-LTx outcomes (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.28, 2.13; p = 0.63). Those requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) at the time of re-LTx had worse outcomes (HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.14, 4.45; p = 0.02). Unlike children following primary LTx, there was no significant improvement in outcomes over time in children with re-LTx (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.41, 2.61; p = 0.94 for transplant era 2013-2024 vs. 1989-2000).
Clinical outcomes for pediatric re-LTx over the past 35 years in the United States remain significantly inferior compared to those for primary LTx. Given these findings, pediatric re-LTx should carefully be considered and restricted to judiciously selected candidates, ideally prior to the development of MV requirement.

PMID:
42757734
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement