Evaluation of the Government indicator methodology in the Global Matrix on physical activity for children and adolescents.

Authors

Iryna Demchenko, Salomé Aubert, Nicholas Kuzik, Lowri C Edwards, Malcolm Ward, Kelly P Arbour-Nicitopoulos, Javier Brazo-Sayavera, Andrea Cortinez-O'Ryan, Gabriela De Roia, Silvia A González, Roselle M Guisihan, Justin Y Jeon, Yeon Soo Kim, Bee Koon Poh, Terézia Kovalik Slančová, José Francisco López-Gil, Kwok Ng, Yves Palad, Diego Augusto Santos Silva, Simone A Tomaz, Piotr Kazimierz Urbański, Mark S Tremblay

Published in

Journal of exercise science and fitness. Volume 24. Issue 4. Pages 200520. Epub Sep 05, 2026.

Abstract

The Government indicator evaluates national policies and strategies for child and adolescent physical activity, supporting country reporting and international comparisons within the Global Matrix initiative. To grade this indicator, countries/jurisdictions apply either the original method or, in recent editions, an alternative approach. The alternative approach was proposed by the Welsh team, who derived six criteria from the World Health Organization's Health-Enhancing Physical Activity Policy Audit Tool v2 and developed an accompanying scoring rubric. This study aimed to evaluate the Welsh approach in comparison with the original method to guide recommendations for future applications.
The study employed a mixed-methods design, including: 1) inductive content analysis of feedback collected via survey from 17 researchers and policy professionals from various countries, and 2) descriptive and Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis of Government indicator grades from Global Matrices 3.0 and 4.0 in 6 countries that transitioned to the Welsh approach and 28 countries/jurisdictions that retained the original method.
User feedback on the Welsh approach was predominantly positive, noting its structure, transparency, and comprehensiveness as strengths, and indicating greater utility and suitability than the original method. Concerns included limited consideration of policy implementation and feasibility aspects. No statistically significant group-level temporal grade differences were found for both methods.
The Welsh approach adds structure and transparency to the Government indicator assessment. Further refinements to the Welsh approach may improve comparability and policy relevance, while both the Welsh and original methods remain acceptable for interim use within the Global Matrix, with potential applicability beyond it.

PMID:
42756624
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.