Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Experimental Evidence for Coronal Mass Ejection Suppression in Strong Stellar Magnetic Fields.

Created on 19 Sep 2026

Authors

S N Chen, K Burdonov, W Yao, J D Alvarado-Gómez, C Argiroffi, J Béard, S Bolanõs, R Bonito, A Ciardi, I Cohen, O Cohen, J J Drake, S Orlando, J Fuchs

Published in

Physical review letters. Volume 137. Issue 10. Pages 105201. Sep 04, 2026.

Abstract

Solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are routinely observed, but as of yet there exist few convincing detections of stellar CMEs. A reason for this could be that the stronger magnetic fields of these stars, compared to that of our Sun, would prevent CME to form and escape. Here we combined astrophysical simulations, measurements of scaled high-energy laser-driven plasma flows, and 3D magnetohydrodynamic modeling to test this hypothesis. Simulations show that, in a 100 G stellar dipole field, low-plasma β CMEs become magnetically confined. In the laboratory, a laser-produced plasma stream scaled to stellar CME conditions propagates freely at low applied magnetic fields (approximately 30 G stellar equivalent), but becomes unstable and halts entirely when the field is increased to 3×10^{5}  G (i.e., a 100 G equivalent). Analytical estimates and numerical simulations suggest that the sudden disruption of the flow is induced by a kink instability. Even though the laboratory environment does not fully reproduce the complex magnetic flux-rope topology of CMEs, these results provide the first laboratory-scale evidence that strong stellar magnetic fields can fully suppress CME propagation, offering a physical explanation for their lack in stellar observations and highlighting the role of magnetic confinement in stellar evolution and exoplanet space weather.

PMID:
42758983
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement