Authors
Poonsak Koonalinthip, Prut Koonalintip, Nantawan Koonalinthip
Published in
Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Sep 16, 2026. Epub Sep 16, 2026.
Abstract
Previous network meta-analyses of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) offloading focused mainly on non-surgical interventions, leaving the role of surgical offloading uncertain. This study compared and ranked surgical and non-surgical offloading strategies for DFU healing.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating offloading interventions for DFUs were systematically reviewed. The primary outcome was ulcer healing rate. A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed, and interventions were ranked using P-scores.
Twenty-eight RCTs, involving 2016 participants, were included. Because the primary analysis demonstrated network inconsistency, conclusions were based on a sensitivity analysis that resolved inconsistency. Surgical offloading (RR 1.47), non-removable knee-high customized devices (RR 1.36), and non-removable knee-high prefabricated devices (RR 1.32) were superior to usual care.
Surgical offloading and non-removable knee-high devices demonstrated the most robust effectiveness for DFU healing, supporting current guideline recommendations and the use of surgical offloading in selected patients.
Level I.
PMID:
42760183
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Sep 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 13
- Comments 0